Inside the Trials: Early Evidence of CAR-T cell therapy in Progressive MS

October 7, 2025

The idea of using CAR-T cell therapy for multiple sclerosis has moved from speculation to practical testing in the clinic. Early reports show that this therapeutic can be delivered safely, can reach the cerebrospinal fluid, and can produce changes in immune biomarkers that matter in progressive disease. This matters because B cells and antibody-producing cells can persist in the central nervous system and sustain inflammation even when peripheral disease activity is controlled. CAR-T cells directed at B-cell targets may reach those compartments and attenuate the immune circuits that drive progression. Researchers and contract research organizations are watching closely as these early studies define protocols, monitoring plans, and data strategies for a new chapter in autoimmune care. 

Why Early Trials Matter
Every paradigm shift begins with a proof of concept. In oncology, the first leukemia patients treated with CAR-T cells provided the foundation for widespread adoption. In autoimmune disease, the story may be unfolding in a similar way, with small and carefully designed Phase 1 studies that establish safety, feasibility, and biological activity. 

Highlights from Current Trials: 

  • KYV-101, a CD19-directed CAR-T, has shown cerebrospinal fluid penetration, sustained reduction in intrathecal antibodies, and no neurotoxicity in two patients with progressive disease. 
  • BMS-986353 has produced rapid and deep B-cell depletion in Phase 1, with no severe immune-effector neurotoxicity reported. 
  • A Genentech dual-target allogeneic CAR-T cell therapy study, NCT07008378, is designed to address scalability challenges that come with autologous manufacturing. 

Key (Bio)markers of Success: 

  • Intrathecal antibody production, which appears reduced following CAR-T cells infusion. 
  • Oligoclonal bands, with potential disappearance in some cases, a target long considered out of reach in multiple sclerosis. 
  • Neurofilament light chain, a marker of axonal damage where reductions may indicate stabilization. 
  • MRI endpoints, including slowly expanding lesions and gadolinium-enhancing lesions. 

What This Means for Patients  

For individuals living with progressive multiple sclerosis, where current therapies often do little to halt the relentless accumulation of disability, these preliminary signs of therapeutic effect are profoundly significant. The possibility of stabilizing the condition, rather than seeing a reversal of long-standing deficits, offers a level of hope that has been largely absent from the treatment landscape. It’s important to approach this new frontier with both optimism and a clear understanding of the journey ahead. Patients considering this therapy should be prepared for close, continuous monitoring, including the management of potential risks such as cytokine release syndrome, infections, and low immunoglobulin levels. The path to treatment will also require careful logistical planning with a specialized multidisciplinary team, as access depends on referral to expert centers and the precise coordination of cell collection and infusion. This is a journey that requires careful planning and a strong support system every step of the way. 

The CRO Perspective 

Early-phase trials for CAR-T cell therapy in multiple sclerosis are uniquely complex, requiring sophisticated operational and scientific management. These studies necessitate a high degree of coordination to ensure patient safety and data integrity from start to finish. 

  • Harmonizing biomarker collection (CSF, blood, MRI). 
  • Ensuring robust safety monitoring for CRS and infections. 
  • Managing logistics of autologous manufacturing (apheresis, vein-to-vein timing).
     

The first trials show that CAR-T cell therapy can be delivered to people with progressive multiple sclerosis and can alter immune activity within the central nervous system without severe neurotoxicity in initial cohorts. Feasibility and early biomarker signals establish a foundation for larger and longer studies that can test clinical efficacy. The next phase will focus on patient selection, dosing, conditioning, and comparisons between autologous and allogeneic strategies. If sustained benefit is demonstrated, cellular therapy could shift the focus of multiple sclerosis care toward deeper control of compartmentalized immune activity. Progress will depend on collaboration among centers, industry partners, contract research organizations, regulators, and patient communities, guided by cautious optimism and rigorous science.